From Head Coach Kat Matheson:
The following is part of an article written by an American Swim Coaches Association staff member.  It explains fully mine and other coaches across the country's philosophy of Age Group swimming.  This also might answer some recent parent questions concerning our team testing and why some swimmers move up and others do not even though the parents feel that their child should be advanced.


The Awesome 8 Year Old
by Guy Edson, ASCA Staff

I have never met a coach who didn't want all their athletes to be the best they can be.

I have never met a parent who didn't want their child to be the best they can be.

So why do we have so many conflicts between coaches and parents?  The simple answer is that each sees a different path.

Let's take the case of the unusually advanced 8 year old whose parents want their child to swim with the next group of 9-12's.  "After all," the mom says, "my son is faster than half of the kids in the next group". (and she is correct.)

Why wouldn't the coach give a wholehearted "Yes" and say, "I'll move him up right away. In fact, I believe he can make the send off intervals that the 11-12"s are making so I'll put him there.  In a year he may be ready for the senior team."

Why not?

Because every good coach sees the importance of long term progressive development and views their young swimmers as long term endeavors.  Coaches should take a patient and progressive approach to the development of their young swimmers.  Coaches want swimmers in the program through their teen years and into their 20's when they are physically mature and have the greatest potential for life-changing participation.

Ask an adult who dropped out of swimming  by age 12 or 13 what they remember from the sport and chances are, they remember very little.  Now ask an adult who swam through college what they remember and chances are they will tell you it was one of the most important life changing experiences of their life.

So how do we keep a swimmer in the sport that long?

Many parents also will echo the importance of long term development. However, they just want to speed it up.  There is a sometimes verbalized refrain, "The better he is now, then the better he will be in the future."

This is not true in most cases. Parents who are otherwise well-meaning sometimes push their budding stars to excel too early at almost any cost.  And the cost is frequently failing to finish the long term.

Parents should take note: A 2001 study by the National Alliance for Youth Sports found that 70 percent of American kids who sign up for sports quit by the time they are 13.  The reason?  They said it wasn't fun anymore.

A study done by the ASCA staff years ago and repeated several times since shows that only 17-20% of the aged 9-10  swimmers ranked in the top 16 are still swimming at the national level 5 years later.  USA Swimming also did a study using the all time Top 100 list and found that only 11% of the top ranked 10& unders are still ranked as 17-18 year olds.

What is the primary reason we lose swimmers?  The number one reason according to a survey done a few years ago is simply that swimming stopped being fun.

And what are the elements of fun?  Friends, caring coaches, and absence of undue pressure from mom and dad to achieve their goals for the child.

When we move an 8 and under to an older age group we....

...take away their opportunity to be the leader of their peers.

...place tremendous pressure on the swimmer because now it's not about having fun and being with friends, now it's about the serious business of work and achieving the goals mom and dad are setting for the child.

...ignore the fact that the 8 year old may be better than the other 8 and unders because he is simply older biologically and developmentally than his peers and in all likelihood his peers will catch up to him at some point and many will pass on by.  When that happens it is very difficult for the swimmer to understand why they aren't so "good " anymore and lose interest in the sport.

...identify the 8 year old as a : "talent" with tremendous pressure to live up to it.  Some parents even identify their young swimmers as "our talented butterflyer" or backstroker or breaststroker, etc.  The problem is, as swimmers grow and body proportions change, they frequently lose their ability to be very good in specific stroke.  If their identity is attached to a stroke and they lose their stroke, then they lose their identity.  Good coaches try very hard to create well rounded IM swimmers.  When parents push a certain stroke upon a child, it adds to the stress.


This is a partial excerpt from the article, but as you can see there are many things to consider in the development of a swimmer.  We ask that you put your trust in the many years of experience that the DDST coaches have and our understanding of the methodology of swimmer development both physically and emotionally.  We care for your children and are trying to make decisions that are in their best interest and which will benefit them in the short term as well as the long term. Sincerely,
Coach Kat Matheson